Exponent Watch For more information and updates on this topic, download our PDF dossier.

Monday, February 28, 2005

Dear Sirs,

I would like to thank you again for your warm reception on February 9. We appreciated the opportunity to discuss these issues with you, and were happy to see how much you valued our comments. We are looking forward to hearing back from you regarding our recommendations and your ideas on how to make the Jewish Exponent a stronger newspaper and more representative of the Greater Philadelphia Jewish Community. 

That said, I am writing to you now with grave concern as to the likelihood that our dialog will bear fruit. The reason for my concern is the article Dean Takes More Flak Over Israel Issue which appeared in last weeks' edition of The Jewish Exponent with which we have already taken exception to  

I want you to know that I am calling a meeting of Exponent Watch to discuss this article and what steps we should take to address it. It would be most helpful if I were to hold this meeting in the context of your response to our recommendations. 

The context of the article Dean Takes More Flak Over Israel Issue is a full-page advertisement by the Republican Jewish Coalition http://www.rjchq.org/media/pdf/DeanAd021005b.pdf which appeared in The Jewish Exponent and other Jewish newspapers. I expect that you already received a number of complaints regarding this advertisement which juxtaposed newly elected DNC Chair Gov. Howard Dean with horrifying graphics of  Palestinian terrorists. 

Many Jewish newspapers sought to balance the misconceptions in the advertisement by reporting on the reaction to the article. (See references.) In brief, they indicated that Dean made the mistake of using language which could be misinterpreted as a "code word for being less supportive of Israel", and that the Democrats who pointed out Dean's mistake, at the time competitors for the Democratic Presidential Nomination, were satisfied with Dean's apology and subsequent strong statements in support of Israel. It should be noted that the Chairman of the DNC is traditionally a fund-raiser and organizer, but does not set policy. (On the other hand, the President has called for international investigations into the events of Jenin, allowed anti-Israel resolutions to be passed by the security council at the UN, financially penalized Israel for constructing a security wall while backing down on its promises not to financially support the Palestinian Authority while Arafat was chairman, all of which many Democrats interpret as being less supportive of Israel.)

As it is The Jewish Exponent's official policy is to correct errors in the same part of the paper in which they originally occurred, to provide a forum where political candidates can speak to us about issues of concern the Jewish community, and to be representative of the Jewish community, it could be expected that The Jewish Exponent would have provided a similar piece in the interest of balance, perhaps eliciting some sort of guest editorial from Gov. Dean, the DNC, the NJDC, or Exponent Watch.

In my view the response of The Jewish Exponent to the paid piece of propaganda which appeared in its own pages was to provide additional free advertising to the conservative point of view. The published piece  Dean Takes More Flak Over Israel Issue ran with the by-line of Matthew E. Berger of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, but is in fact substantially different from Berger's work, so different as to present a substantially different perspective than the original. So you may judge for yourselves, I have included below the original text of this article as provided by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA) and the edited version published in The Jewish Exponent. 

I must admit that I noted some conservative tendencies already in the choice of  the original article even before editting. For example, the term "Democratic operatives" loaded with negative connotations is used twice, and the article includes two brief quotes from Ira Forman of the NJDC. These quotes are very much out of the context of a thirty-minute interview with Forman, and can be construed by the reader as being at least mildly supportive of the RJC advertisement. This is an error of fact, as Forman's extensive writings on the subject, posted on the NJDC website and elsewhere, clearly denounce the RJC advertisement in the strongest terms. That said, Mr. Forman's quote is followed by quotes of other Democrats making good points in favor of Dean and against the RJC advertisement. This gives the article a reasonable measure of balance.

Unfortunately, the version of article published in the Exponent (on the right below) was edited to buttress the conservative message and eliminate the original article's balance. The editor eliminated the article's reference to the non-partisan ADL's opposition to the advertisement. 

Instead, the editor added language describing Dean's remarks as "unsavory off-the-cuff ... remarks regarding Israel's fight against terrorism". The reader is drawn in wondering what sort of unsavory remarks were made. "Unsavory remarks" to me brings to mind the French ambassador's quip about a "petit pays de merde" (shitty little country), not a suggestion (quickly retracted) that the United States remain "evenhanded". 

Worse still is the complete elimination of the seven paragraphs following and providing balance to the Forman misquote. The resulting article is left completely unbalanced and misleading. By editing the article in this manner, it no longer reflects the intentions of the author Matthew Berger, and it ceases to be suitable for publication as a piece of news. By presenting what is now an op/ed piece as news, and presenting the editor's opinions as those coming from a respected national writer, the editor may be seeking to validate his views in the eyes of the remaining readership of The Jewish Exponent.

After our meeting earlier this month, I had hoped that the editor would be more sensitive to these issues. However, this article and the editor's characterization of his participation in the Gratz debate suggest to me that this is not the case. If he refuses to characterize himself as a Republican and to recognize the conservative bias in our newspaper, how can we hope for him to address this issue of his own accord?

I hope that steps can be taken to assuage my concern and I look forward to hearing from you soon, both in regards to our February 9th meeting as well as this more recent matter.

Respectfully yours,

Dr. Daniel E. Loeb

References:

Version of Article in Jewish Telegraphic Agency

As Dean chosen to head Democrats, accusations fly on his Israel stance
By: Matthew E. Berger

WASHINGTON, Feb. 16 (JTA) � Even before he officially became the Democratic National Committee's new chairman, Howard Dean was a source of contention.

Questions about Dean's support for Israel, which first made headlines during his run for the Democratic presidential nomination last year, resurfaced just before he was elected Feb. 12. as the new leader of the Democratic Party, and have been exacerbated by advertisements from the Republican Jewish Coalition.

The criticism was expected. Some Democrats had worried that Dean would be a lightning rod for Republican attacks. But at a time when Democrats are trying to shore up their standing among Jewish voters, the presence of a national chairman whose support for the Jewish state is questionable could be a stumbling block.

"It certainly doesn't help," one Jewish Democratic operative said. "He suffers from the same bad perception. The same way the party got tainted, he got tainted."

Dean, a former Vermont governor, was the subject of an e-mail smear campaign during the Democratic primaries last year after he made several off-the-cuff remarks suggesting the United States should take a more "even-handed" approach to the Israeli-Palestinian dispute.

The term is often understood in the Jewish community as a code word for being less supportive of Israel. Dean was criticized at the time by other Democratic presidential candidates, including U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman (D-Conn.) and other party leaders. Now those quotes have resurfaced in RJC ads that appeared this week in Roll Call, a Capitol Hill newspaper, and in Jewish newspapers across the country.

The ads feature Lieberman saying Dean's comments "break a 50-year record in which presidents, Republican and Democrat, members of Congress of both parties have supported our relationship with Israel based on shared values."

Jay Footlik, the Jewish liaison for Sen. John Kerry's presidential campaign last year, also is quoted suggesting that centrist Jewish Democrats would be turned off by Dean as party chairman.

But now Lieberman said the ads don't tell the full story.

"Gov. Dean responded to me and others by calling his comments a mistake," Lieberman told JTA in a statement Tuesday. "I'm confident that as party chairman, Howard will uphold the Democratic Party's historic commitment to support and strengthen our democratic ally Israel."

The ads are being criticized by the Anti-Defamation League, in part because they feature an image of several men covered in white sheets with explosive vests, fawning over a young boy dressed to emulate a suicide bomber.

Democrats said the picture was too much, but the RJC's executive director, Matt Brooks, defended it.

"I think we are all outraged by the photo, but unfortunately, that's the reality of the world today," Brooks said. "When he says it's not our place to take sides, what he is saying is Israel should be forced to negotiate under the threat of terror."

Brooks said the organization considered using a different photo, of Dean wearing a keffiyeh, a traditional Arab head covering.

Aside from the photo controversy, the ad raises questions about how Dean and the party he leads will be perceived among Jews. While his campaign fought against the criticism last year � and the National Jewish Democratic Council has circulated pro-Israel statements Dean made on the campaign trail � Dean suffers from the stigma of being seen as anti-Israel, at least in some Jewish circles.

Jewish Democrats worked hard last year to quell the perception that the Bush administration and Republicans were stronger supporters of Israel than the Democrats were. Despite widespread belief that Jewish votes would make a difference in the presidential election, the small shifts of Jewish support to the Republicans in key states were not enough to effect outcomes.

And in the end, Jews voted overwhelmingly Democratic in the presidential election. Kerry received 77 percent of the Jewish vote, compared to 23 percent for President Bush. Bush received 19 percent in 2000.

Democratic operatives worry that Jews who are unsure about the party's support for Israel � including traditional Democrats who backed Bush last year � might be turned off by Dean.

"The little comments and the questions they raise, you don't have to have a seismic impact for it to matter," said Dan Gerstein, a Democratic strategist. "Dean dug himself into a real hole with Jews concerned about

U.S. support for Israel and who are wary of the Democrats for this."

Ira Forman, the NJDC's executive director, said he understood that such criticism of Dean was legitimate "from an attack-dog perspective."

"It is incumbent on all of us to show all of what he has said," Forman said. "I'm confident he is going to work with the Jewish community."

Jewish Democrats say they welcome the opportunity to showcase Dean's full record on Israel.

"What we want to talk about is not what Howard Dean may or may not have said, but what he's going to say," said Susan Turnbull, a Democratic activist in the Jewish community who was elected Feb. 12 as the DNC vice chairwoman.

"These attacks are unfounded, and what Howard Dean has said is he will never abandon Israel."

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee issued a news release Monday congratulating Dean on his election.

"AIPAC has a long-standing relationship with Governor Dean," said the statement by AIPAC's president, Bernice Manocherian, and its executive director, Howard Kohr.

"We are confident that as chair of the Democratic Party, Governor Dean will carry on the party's deep and abiding commitment to a strong and unshakable relationship between the United States and Israel."

Dean did receive some support from the Jewish community during his presidential campaign. His chief Jewish liaison was Steve Grossman, a former president of AIPAC and himself a former chairman of the DNC.

He also often cited the fact that his wife, Judith Steinberg, is Jewish, and that his children have chosen to practice Judaism.

Dean participated in Chanukah celebrations with staffers on the campaign trail in New Hampshire, even reciting Hebrew blessings over the menorah.

Dean continued his quest for Jewish approval Feb. 10 at a party honoring his ascension to the DNC chairmanship. Presented with a shofar by the NJDC, Dean lifted it, pressed it to his lips and blew.

 
Version of Article in Jewish Exponent
Dean Takes More Flak Over Israel Issue

2/24/2005
Matthew E. Berger, Jewish Telegraphic Agency

WASHINGTON - Even before he officially became the Democratic National Committee's new chairman, Howard Dean was a source of contention.

Questions about his support for Israel, which first made headlines during Dean's run for the Democratic presidential nomination last year, have resurfaced in the wake of the Feb. 12 election making him the new leader of the Democratic Party.

The source of much of the criticism is the Republican Jewish Coalition, which last week launched a national advertising campaign highlighting some unsavory off-the-cuff Dean remarks regarding Israel's fight against terror.

At a time when Democrats are trying to shore up their standing among Jewish voters, the presence of a national chair whose support for the Jewish state is questionable could be a stumbling block.

"It certainly doesn't help," said one Jewish Democratic operative. "He suffers from the same bad perception. The same way the party got tainted, he got tainted."

Dean, former governor of Vermont governor, was the target of an e-mail campaign during the Democratic primaries last year after he suggested that the United States should take a more "evenhanded" approach to the Mideast conflict.

The term, which is often understood in the Jewish community as a code word for being less supportive of Israel, is the subject of the current ad, which appeared in Roll Call, a Capitol Hill newspaper, and in Jewish newspapers across the country.

When he made his remarks at the height of the 2004 presidential primaries, Dean was criticized by other Democratic presidential candidates, including Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman and other party leaders.

The ads feature Lieberman saying Dean's comments "break a 50-year record in which presidents, Republican and Democrat, members of Congress of both parties have supported our relationship with Israel based on shared values."

Lieberman said that the ads don't tell the full story.

"Gov. Dean responded to me and others by calling his comments a mistake," said the senator in a statement. "I'm confident that as party chairman, Howard will uphold the Democratic Party's historic commitment to support and strengthen our democratic ally Israel."

�A real hole'

The ads feature an image of several men in white sheets and explosive vests, fawning over a young boy dressed to emulate a suicide bomber. Democrats said the picture was too much, but the RJC's executive director, Matthew Brooks, defended it.

"I think we are all outraged by the photo, but unfortunately, that's the reality of the world today," said Brooks. "When he says it's not our place to take sides, what he is saying is Israel should be forced to negotiate under the threat of terror."

Spurred on by Republicans highlighting Dean's record, Democratic operatives worry that Jews who are unsure about the party's support for Israel � including traditional Democrats who backed Bush last year � might be turned off by the new party chair.

"The little comments and the questions they raise, you don't have to have a seismic impact for it to matter," said Dan Gerstein, a Democratic strategist. "Dean dug himself into a real hole with Jews concerned about U.S. support for Israel, and who are wary of the Democrats for this."

Ira Forman, the NJDC's executive director, said he understood that such criticism of Dean was legitimate "from an attack-dog perspective."

"It is incumbent on all of us to show all of what he has said," said Forman. "I'm confident he is going to work with the Jewish community."

Current Issues * Feedback * About * Links * Masthead * Copyright * Advertising * ExponentWatch * Donate